Research on sound and music after the so-called sensory turn began to develop with particular intensity in the 1990s, compelling a forced renewal of the language and framework of musicological descriptions. The lines shaping the studies of noise, sound, silence, quiet, voice, listening, and the boundaries of music began to intertwine in complex ways, simultaneously diversifying and forming distinct epistemic regions with their own analytical tools. An especially notable phenomenon is the invasion of new theoretical conventions into practical domains, where the musical post-avant-garde, new sound cartographies, and digital sound ethnographies began to converge and qualitatively respond to complex theories of the sonic sphere.
These enclaves of research—of phenomenological, critical, cognitive, technological, historical-environmental, and social orientation—have, since the mid-2000s, on the one hand, moved away from each other and, on the other, spontaneously converged in broader studies of sound and voice. The paradox lies in the fact that representatives of each of these areas not only remain unaware of the existence of competing fields and the scale of the intellectual work already accomplished, but also fail to recognize the alternative and complementary domains investigating sound and music. This has created a unique epistemological configuration, aptly described by Michel Foucault (2004): «The different works, the individual books, the vast mass of texts that belong to a single discursive formation, and the great number of authors, known or unknown to each other, criticizing, refuting, copying from each other, without consultation arriving at identical conclusions, obstinately weaving their isolated discourses into an unbroken fabric, over which they have no control, whose totality they cannot see, and whose breadth escapes their imagination.» (pp. 243–244).
Our penal aims to attempt an overview of this field as a whole, focusing on the epistemologies of the sonic and musical spheres. We welcome both theoretical and empirical papers.
As a research guide for the papers, the following questions may serve as points of reference: how is knowledge about sound constructed? is it possible to connect music and sound within the same ontological field? who acts as the agent of sonic knowledge production? are the categories of understanding and meaning applicable as tools of sonic epistemologies? should the music sciences abandon part of their outdated language? what do we know about sound, and what do we know through sound? how should «meta-knowledge,» which unites the practical and theoretical into a coherent whole, be organized, and are there epistemic risks in doing so? how can sound be translated into the humanities without losing the original object in the process?