Taking Legal
Philosophy Seriously
10, 12-13 April, 2025
Format: on Shaninka campus and online
Language: Russian, English
Moderators: Aleksej Iljushkin (HSE student), Ivan Kilyakov (HSE student), Aishat Garipova (HSE student), Vladislav Lebedev (HSE student), Ilya Evseev (HSE student), Anna Pristupa (HSE student), Diana Kabilova (HSE student)

Abstract

As early as the 19th century, the German jurisprude Rudolf von Jhering described jurisprudence as the "Cinderella of the science" (Das Aschenbrödel der Wissenschaft). Around the same period, the renowned Russian private law scholar Georgiy Gambaryan wrote about the lack of popularity of jurisprudence in Russia. Later, in the 1970s, this issue caught the attention of the American sociologist Talcott Parsons, who addressed it in his article "Law as an Intellectual Stepchild." In our time, the Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court, John Roberts, has similarly noted that the theoretical understanding of law fails to attract the interest of practicing lawyers.

Scholars still debate on the subject matter and objectives of the philosophy of law / jurisprudence, and no consensus has yet been reached. Thus, the unique and paradoxical position of legal philosophy within the framework of social sciences and humanities is evident. Moreover, this phenomenon is international in scope.

Since the philosophical study of law is a rather marginal activity, the question arises about the relevance and significance of the philosophy of law as a separate field of knowledge. At first glance, the view that legal philosophy lacks practical application and occupies a peripheral position in theoretical debates may seem justified. Under such an assumption, the best-case scenario for legal philosophy would be to serve as a beginner’s guide to legal terminology.

In light of this, the primary goal of our section is to challenge the widespread notion that legal philosophy serves merely as a handmaiden to practical jurisprudence, which itself is often viewed as a service-oriented discipline. During the session, we will not only strive to conceptualize the subject matter of our field but also work to integrate it into the broader context of the social sciences and humanities.

How can this goal be achieved? We aim to demonstrate the capacity of legal philosophers to address fundamental questions about the organization of human society and the essence of concepts such as justice and ethics. This endeavor is significant not only for practical jurisprudence but also for philosophy, particularly political and moral philosophy.

Legal philosophy has the potential to serve as a bridge between theoretical research and applied social sciences and humanities. Such interaction can open new horizons for the conceptual understanding of complex social phenomena and foster the development of applied disciplines.

Therefore, we invite specialists from diverse fields to explore the boundaries of philosophical reflection on law!
The section is organized by the participants of the Law Theory Club of the National Research University Higher School of Economics with the organizational support of the Department of Law Theory and Comparative Law of the Faculty of Law of the National Research University Higher School of Economics and with the informational support of the Russian Bar Association.

Main topics

  • The Subject Matter and Methodology of Legal Philosophy.
  • Approaches to Legal Understanding: Positivism vs. Anti-Positivism.
  • The Key Concepts in Contemporary Legal Philosophy: Criticism of Dogmatic Jurisprudence.
  • The Linguistic Turn in the Legal Philosophy: Legal Reality and Legal Language.
  • Legal Pluralism: Is It All or Nothing for Law? Non-State Models of Community Regulation.
  • Legal Philosophy in Action: Practical Jurisprudence and the Limits of Legal Interpretation.
  • Philosophical Grain in Historical and Comparative Jurisprudence.
  • Law in the Digital and Post-Truth Era.
Keynote speakers
  1. Daria G. Alova, Candidate of Legal Sciences, Lecturer, Department of Theory of Law and Comparative Law, Faculty of Law, National Research University Higher School of Economics
  2. Mikhail V. Antonov, Candidate of Legal Sciences, PhD in Law, Professor at the Department of the Theory and History of the Law and State, Saint Petersburg Branch of the National Research University Higher School of Economics.
  3. Dmitry V. Balashov, Candidate of Law, Senior Lecturer, Department of Theory of Law and Comparative Law, Faculty of Law, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
  4. Rodion Y. Belkovich, Candidate of Legal Sciences, Associate Professor at the Department of Legal Theory and Comparative Law, Faculty of Law, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
  5. Maxim A. Belyaev, Candidate of Philosophy, Associate Professor at the Department of Theory of State and Law at the Kutafin Moscow State Law University.
  6. Andrey S. Bystrov, Candidate of Legal Sciences, Associate Professor at the Department of Legal Theory and Comparative Law, Faculty of Law, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
  7. Sergey V. Vinogradov, Lecturer, Department of Theory of Law and Comparative Law, Faculty of Law, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
  8. Sergey N. Kasatkin, Candidate of Legal Sciences, Associate Professor at the Department of Theory of Law and Public Law Disciplines, Leading Researcher of the Evidence-Based Social Policy Laboratory, Samara State University of Economics.
  9. Sofia V. Koval, Candidate of Philosophy, Senior Lecturer, Department of Theory of Law and Comparative Law, Faculty of Law, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
  10. Varvara A. Lushnikova, Candidate of Legal Sciences, Lecturer, Department of Theory of Law and Comparative Law, Faculty of Law, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
  11. Alexander E. Naumov, Candidate of Legal Sciences, Associate Professor at the Department of Theory of State and Law and Political Science, Faculty of Law, Lomonosov Moscow State University.
  12. Yuri E. Permyakov, Candidate of Legal Sciences, Associate Professor at the Department of Theory and History of State and Law, International Law, Samara State University.
  13. Alexander V. Pischulin, Candidate of Legal Sciences, Associate Professor at the Department of Theory of State and Law and Political Science, Faculty of Law, Lomonosov Moscow State University.
  14. Nikolay V. Razuvaev, Doctor of Law, Head of the Department of Civil and Labor Law of the North-West Institute of Management of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, Editor-in-Chief of the journal Theoretical and Applied Jurisprudence.
  15. Alexander A. Safonov, Doctor of Law, Professor at the Department of Theory of Law and Comparative Law, Faculty of Law, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
  16. Anita K. Soboleva, Candidate of Philological Sciences, Associate Professor at the Department of Theory of Law and Comparative Law, Faculty of Law, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
  17. Vladimir D. Churakov, Candidate of Legal Sciences, Senior Lecturer, Department of Theory of Law and Comparative Law, Faculty of Law, National Research University Higher School of Economics.

Регистрация

Перейти к заказу билетов
Contacts
vectors@universitas.ru
Shaninka, Gazetny Lane, 3-5, building 1